Looking to the Right: My Thoughts on the 2012 Republican National Convention

Politically speaking, I lean to the left.  I vote Democrat.  I support Affirmative Action, the DREAM act, gay marriage, the legalization of marijuana and I am pro choice.  I believe in ending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and I support Wall Street regulation.  That being said, it’s August; convention time!  So I spent this week listening in on the Republican National Convention with the intention of getting to know my political polar opposites a little better; the Right.  To be honest, I’ve never watched a full RNC before.  I’ve protested at one (The 2004 RNC in New York), but I haven’t really given Republicans a fair shot with regard to understanding their ideology.  So this time around, I challenged myself to listen to their keynote speakers and platform.

Not long into the first night of speeches, I began to have what might be called an allergic reaction.  All of my liberal white blood cells within my body rushed to lobby against what they detected as a foreign invasion; an immune system sortie on the rhetoric that threatened to destroy me with distortions, comments taken out of context and extremism.  Sadly to say, I found myself acting very juvenile in response; mocking my Republican officials with my own brand of political satire, taking shots at their bright red clothing and even sarcastically applauding with the audience and chanting along; “WE BUILT IT!”  (I even created a Village People YMCA- like cheer involving my hands signaling MITT for Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney)  Needless to say, I needed to step up my maturity if I was going to get anything meaningful out of this convention.

But perhaps my embarrassing antics were exacerbated by comments like “We are truly the best, last hope on Earth,” made by Saratoga Springs, UT Mayor Mia Love as she brought her speech to a close.  I honestly believe America is a country that would oppose existential threats to life by totalitarian states or terrorist organizations on Earth regardless if a Republican or Democrat was elected president.  I understand her intention was to make a rallying call to her party members, but portraying the GOP as the savior of the planet seems a little exaggerated.

And when New Jersey Governor Chris Christie took the podium and said, “We are the great grandchildren of men and women who broke their backs in the name of American ingenuity; the grandchildren of the Greatest Generation; the sons and daughters of immigrants…” I couldn’t help but think that he missed a great opportunity to prove the claims that some in the Republican Party have made about them being the party most suited to address the needs of the African-American community, by not recognizing the contribution that slaves made to this country, in addition to immigrants.

On the second night of the convention, I determined to act my age and listen attentively.  I enjoyed listening to Arizona Senator John McCain and even though I disagreed with Attorney Generals Pam Bondi (FL) and Sam Olens’ (GA) view on Obamacare, I now feel as if I understand their objectives a little more clearly.  But when former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice commented “…we need to give parents greater choice, particularly poor parents whose kids, very often minorities, are trapped in failing neighborhood schools. This is the civil rights issue of our day,” I felt she, like Governor Chris Christie, once again missed out on a great opportunity to show America that the GOP was the party best suited to meet the needs of the African-American Community (as well as other minority communities) by directly linking the struggle for those minority voters who now find themselves marginalized because of new voter ID laws across the country, with what she claims as the “civil rights issue of our day.”

To be honest, I think Mitt Romney would be a good president for the American economy.  He knows business.  He knows how to generate income.  I think it would be a step backwards on many of the social issues that are important to me if Mitt Romney were elected, but a step forward for the economy, mainly because, he would not be facing a Congress that, quite frankly, would be as hostile to his proposed agenda, as it has been to President Obama.  Put quite simply, I think the legislative process may run more smoothly with Mitt Romney at the helm because the obstacle of an African-American as president for a majority White Republican Congress that is obviously still dealing with the ever-present challenge of race in our society, will have been removed.

Yet, it is my hope that President Obama is reelected, as I do plan to vote for him.  And should his supporters vote, not only for him but for the Democratic leadership in the Congress and Senate that is necessary to assist him with his agenda (As sadly, in my opinion, we did not do a good enough job of in 2010, which gave rise to many of the Tea Party members assuming seats in Congress, and subsequently, creating a force of opposition to the President), I believe the economy will grow, and more jobs will be created.

On an unrelated note, I have been reading Love, Life and Elephants: An African Love Story by Dame Daphne Sheldrick.  The book is about her experiences running an orphanage for animals near Tsavo National Park in Kenya,  and I decided to draw one of the elephants from the photos in the book for the illustration for this article.  (I learned about Dame Daphne Sheldrick from one of Chelsea Clinton’s stories on NBC Nightly News)  I may not agree with the GOP, but they have a great mascot!



2 thoughts on “Looking to the Right: My Thoughts on the 2012 Republican National Convention

  1. Hi Carla! Thanks for sharing Matt Taibbi’s article. I always wondered what happened to KB Toys. That place was like the babysitter for me and my brother when my parents would drop us off at the mall. I loved that store!

    I guess the question is, if Mitt Romney is elected, will he go about conducting business in a more socially responsible way; a way that does not shoulder companies with massive debt in order to create wealth for a few. Taibbi’s account of what happened to Ampad and other companies is frightening. Another question is that if Romney becomes President, will the inevitable increased scrutiny on his future business practices (the general public knew virtually nothing about Bain Capital until recently) or proposed plans to grow the economy and create jobs be enough of a deterrent to abandon what seems like to me, to have been very unethical practices in the past. If so, because it’s hard to imagine that Romney would be able to operate in the same way as President of the United States without his every move being covered in the media, maybe Taibbi is correct in saying “perhaps Mitt Romney is the best man to manage the transition.” But in the end I agree with Taibbi, and want nothing to do with “wholesale surrender.”

    Are there any readers of this blog that would like to argue in support for Mitt Romney? If so please feel free to comment or share information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s